
\begin{table}[H]
\caption{Models of support for closing  the court. Models include only the individual-level variables, populist discourse, and the main interaction terms.}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c}
\hline
 & Model 1 & Model 2 & Model 3 \\
\hline
Populist Discourse                & $-0.04$       & $-0.13$       & $-0.23$       \\
                                  & $(0.13)$      & $(0.13)$      & $(0.15)$      \\
Populist Speech x Pres. Supporter &               & $0.25^{***}$  & $0.32^{***}$  \\
                                  &               & $(0.08)$      & $(0.10)$      \\
Populist Speech x Non-Voter       &               &               & $0.14$        \\
                                  &               &               & $(0.10)$      \\
Presidential Supporter            & $0.25^{***}$  & $0.13$        & $0.09$        \\
                                  & $(0.07)$      & $(0.08)$      & $(0.08)$      \\
Non\_Voter                        & $0.17^{***}$  & $0.17^{***}$  & $0.10$        \\
                                  & $(0.06)$      & $(0.06)$      & $(0.08)$      \\
Support for Democracy             & $-0.07^{***}$ & $-0.07^{***}$ & $-0.07^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      & $(0.01)$      \\
Satisfaction with Democracy       & $0.16^{***}$  & $0.16^{***}$  & $0.16^{***}$  \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
Education                         & $-0.05^{***}$ & $-0.05^{***}$ & $-0.05^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.00)$      & $(0.00)$      & $(0.00)$      \\
Wealth                            & $-0.38^{***}$ & $-0.38^{***}$ & $-0.38^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.08)$      & $(0.08)$      & $(0.08)$      \\
Rural                             & $-0.09^{***}$ & $-0.09^{***}$ & $-0.09^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.03)$      & $(0.03)$      & $(0.03)$      \\
Female                            & $-0.13^{***}$ & $-0.13^{***}$ & $-0.13^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.03)$      & $(0.03)$      & $(0.03)$      \\
Interpersonal Trust               & $-0.06^{***}$ & $-0.06^{***}$ & $-0.06^{***}$ \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
Neighborhood Safe                 & $-0.04^{**}$  & $-0.04^{**}$  & $-0.04^{**}$  \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
Economic Evaluation               & $0.12^{***}$  & $0.12^{***}$  & $0.12^{***}$  \\
                                  & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      & $(0.02)$      \\
\hline
AIC                               & $34724.96$    & $34718.20$    & $34718.31$    \\
Log Likelihood                    & $-17338.48$   & $-17334.10$   & $-17333.15$   \\
Num. obs.                         & $43244$       & $43244$       & $43244$       \\
Num. groups: country:year         & $49$          & $49$          & $49$          \\
Num. groups: country              & $18$          & $18$          & $18$          \\
Var: country:year (Intercept)     & $0.08$        & $0.08$        & $0.08$        \\
Var: country (Intercept)          & $0.10$        & $0.11$        & $0.12$        \\
Var: country winner1              & $0.06$        & $0.05$        & $0.05$        \\
Var: country non\_voter1          & $0.03$        & $0.03$        & $0.03$        \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{\scriptsize{$^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:si_court_mods_slim}
\end{center}
\end{table}
